patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Aquidneck Island Family Fights to Preserve School Bus Monitor Law

A change in law that would empower cities and towns to decide whether to keep or cut school bus monitors for grades K-5 will be heard at the Statehouse on Thursday.

 

On Thursday, March 3, the Pendergasts of Middletown and Newport will return to the Statehouse in Providence to argue on behalf of keeping Rhode Island’s mandate that requires safety monitors on all school buses for grades kindergarten through 5.

The public hearing with the House Municipal Government Committee is scheduled to begin between 3 and 4 p.m. in Room 203, and the family has sprung into action trying to get parents, educators, school bus personnel and other advocates of the school bus safety law to attend.

It’s a scene the family has replayed many times since 1986, when the law was first passed after three children within an 18-month period throughout Rhode Island had been killed by their own school buses. One of those tragedies involved 6-year-old Vanessa Anne, a first-grader at Aquidneck Elementary School, daughter to Bill and Sophia Pendergast and the youngest of their four daughters when they lived in Middletown at the time.

“It seems to come up again more so when there’s an economic downturn,” reflected Bill Pendergast, now 70, retired from the Newport Police Department and living in Newport with Sophia. “It’s (about) costs and cutting costs … About two weeks into the legislative session every year, I go in to the state website and look … and sure enough, there it was again this year, though I was surprised at how early this one came out and I'm worried how fast it's moving.”

He refers to House Bill No. 5186 (An Act Relating to Education—Health and Safety of Pupils), introduced on Jan. 27 and referred to the House Municipal Government Committee. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Doreen Marie Costa (R-Dist. 31, Exeter, North Kingstown), with Rep. Daniel P. Gordon Jr. (R-Dist. 71, Portsmouth, Tiverton, Little Compton), Rep. J. Patrick O'Neill (D-Dist. 59, Pawtucket), and Rep. Brian C. Newberry (R-Dist.r 48, North Smithfield, Burrillville) also attached as introducing the bill.

If passed, it would eliminate Rhode Island’s mandate for school bus monitors for kindergarten through grade 5 riders, leaving the matter up for cities and towns to decide to keep or cut.

The bill's primary sponsor, Rep. Doreen Marie Costa (R-Dist. 31, Exeter, North Kingstown) said the measure could help those cities and towns in dire financial straits right now. She said she received reports from some cities in northern Rhode Island seeking relief but declined to name those cities.

"I'm not saying we should pull bus monitors from anyone or that we should take bus monitors away from any cities and towns. This would be an option for cities and towns," Costa said. "And some are in real dire straits right now and are telling us they need some options." 

Rhode Island reportedly is the only state nationwide to require that school bus monitors be on all school buses for grades K to 5.

Since successfully lobbying with a coalition of other families for school bus safety reform that, among other measures, included the requirement of having the second supervising adult on board, the Pendergast family has remained active in lobbying to keep the law in place.

Sophia and Bill Pendergast, along with daughter Julie Mott, of Middletown, and Elizabeth Clark — Julie’s own daughter of college age now — have concerns over the latest bill, as they watch it move quickly to a hearing early in the legislative session and have heard of little public outcry or public awareness.

“I very much fear that without people showing up on Thursday, this will be the end of school bus monitors,” Julie said. “People being present, standing before them, will make a difference.”

Sophia added, “They can just say ‘I do not support this’ and leave it at that. But it has to be parents who say to them, ‘You cannot do this to my child.’ ”

They are quick to point out, and news accounts support, that no children have been killed by school buses in Rhode Island with a bus monitor present since the law was passed in 1986, while between 1979 and 1986 at least one school bus fatality had occurred each year along with other non-fatal injuries.

“History tells us, statistics tell us, that if this gets passed, a child will be killed,” Julie maintained. She added, “And in 1985, children were not walking around with iPods and phones to their ears. And drivers passing school buses were not distracted talking on cell phones in 1985. Drivers and children are more distracted now and there’s an even greater need for that extra adult there now to look out for them.”

A founding member of FISST (Families Insisting on Safe Student Transportation), Sophia over the last 25 years has maintained her role as a vocal advocate on school bus safety and continues to receive contact from parents and others from the United States and Canada, she said, on a variety of issues ranging from bus monitors to mechanical issues and the screening of the drivers themselves.

She cites studies and statistics about driver distraction being a main cause of vehicular accidents.

She worries about the disruptions on board buses without that extra adult supervisor to ensure that bus riders remain well-behaved and don’t distract the bus driver.

She also worries about the General Assembly leaving it up to cities and towns as they fall on hard times to decide whether to keep or cut bus monitors. "No parent wants to see this happen to any child in Middletown or Providence or in Central Falls. We cannot allow buses to kill our children. Period."

In 1985, Sophia had later learned the bus driver was turned around trying to settle a sudden disruption among the students when the bus accelerated, struck and killed  Vanessa. She was reportedly crossing in front of the bus, as the bus safety manuals had prescribed as a precaution back then, but she was crossing within the blind spot where drivers cannot see young children.

Julie, then 14, was at the scene where her sister had died, having been sent to meet her at the bus stop.

A mother now with children of her own, she hopes other parents in Rhode Island will join her in fighting to keep bus monitors a mandate.

“My parents have been fighting for this for 28 years. My father is now 70. He can’t do this forever,” Julie said. “It’s no longer about Vanessa and I’m no longer speaking about this as Vanessa’s sister. I’m talking about this as a mom now, with a 7-year-old of my own that I want to protect…This is no longer about what happened back then but what’s happening today — in a much, much more distracted world.”

The public hearing on House Bill 5186 is scheduled for Thursday, March 3, and is expected to begin between 3 and 4 p.m. in Room 203 at the Statehouse in Providence. Those wishing to speak or to register as being pro or con are advised to arrive beginning at 3 p.m. Those unable to attend may also contact the House Municipal Government Chairperson Rep. Jon Brien (D-District 50, Woonsocket) at 766-9887, Vice Chairperson Rep. Peter Martin (D-District 75, Newport) at 924-2402, or their local legislators. Click here for your local legislator's contact information.

For more information about FISST, contact Julie Mott at 225-1791 or ja-mott@cox.net or Sophia Pendergast at 846-8513 or sfpggp@cox.net.

Elizabeth Clark

9:37 am on Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Please come to the State House on Thursday...The futures of Rhode Island children depend on it....No child's life is worth some saved money

Reply

Bill

12:20 pm on Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Using the statistics listed to make the claim that children will die does not work. If this were true, dozens or even hundreds of children would be killed in other more populus states. In addition, there have been injuries that were not prevented by monitors. In order to justify this overbearing financial burden, lets hear how many injuries and fatalities were actuall prevented. Surely, bus monitors track and report the number of times they had to fish a kid out from under the bus. Perhaps it would be agreeable to mount cameras around and under the bus. It would cost a few thousand dollars, but save the expense of the monitor.

Reply

Julie Mott

5:23 pm on Wednesday, March 2, 2011

To Bill's point - there is no centralized, mandatory repository to track children who are injured or killed in school bus related fatalities. That would be very useful data however it has never been required. In 1985 (the year 3 RI school children were killed and the last year where a fatality occurred in this state) none of the deaths were reported to the only nationwide voluntary reporting database maintained at that time by the Kansas Dept of Transportation. The sad reality is that no tracking exists. What we do know as fact is that in 1985 and the years preceding RI school children died (not including injuries) at a rate of 1 approx. every 18 months. That is fact and that occurred in a time without cell phones, iPods and DS's.

Reply

Bill

8:39 pm on Wednesday, March 2, 2011

I guess the point I was trying to make is that it is specious reasoning to say that no children have died because of the bus monitors. More likely, it is due to the increased vigilance of parents. When I was a child, kids would walk to or be dropped at the bus stop and left alone. The same would occur in reverse in the afternoon. I can't remember the last time I saw a kid alone at a bus stop any younger than middle school age. I've seen the halfhearted job that monitors do. Honestly, I can't say I blame them. Based on national statistics I have seen, nearly 100% of children would be clear of the bus. Any child dying in a senseless accident is probably one of the worst tragedies which can happen, in my opinion. That said, the cost and effectiveness has to be considered. We spend over $100,000 in Middletown alone for bus monitors. Why can't we put that money into a technology-based solution. That would be especially effective if you changed the law so that instead of monitors, at least 1 caregiver must be present to allow a child to get off the bus. Taking it a step further, RFID and bus GPS technology could be incorporated into the system so that there would be a high level of information available to parents, the driver, and the school. There is a better way. Keeping the law will prevent that way from ever happening.

Reply

sophia pendergast

10:05 pm on Wednesday, March 2, 2011

The number one cause of all school bus accidents, be it vehicle to pedestrian, vehicle to vehicle, or vehicle to property, is driver distraction. Drivers are distracted mostly by the passengers they transport. Since the monitor law was passed in 1986, RI has not had any deaths and has reduced all other school bus accidents by 65%.
I have had the unfortunate opportunity to meet or speak with parents whose children have been sexually assaulted (1st, 2nd and 3rd degree), robbed, physically assaulted and even accidentally strangled by a preschool classmate while riding in the bus. In all of these cases the driver was not aware of the incident until the end of the run.
Monitors do not malfunction in inclement weather, they are not tampered with while parked overnight, and they can easily be replaced the very next day when unable to perform their duties.
Bill, I would challenge you to take on 65 or more children alone for a ride anyday.

Reply

Julie Mott

10:56 am on Thursday, March 3, 2011

YOU DID IT...FOR NOW!!!!!!!!!
PLEASE NOTE: H-5186(The Monitor Bill) HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN AT THE SPONSOR'S REQUEST posted on the Committee Docket! One small victory but please stay vigilant...this is most likely not the end of this. Channel 10 & Channel 12 are doing interviews later today so stay tuned!!! AND THANK YOU ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

Angela Lemire

11:49 am on Thursday, March 3, 2011

The hearing is still happening today - I just confirmed from Rep. Martin, the committee vice-chair. Rep. Costa also confirmed that she took her name off the bill as the bill sponsor, but Rep. Newberry is now the new sponsor and the hearing will go on.

Rep. Martin informs me that he'll be posting a similar update here shortly.

Reply

Peter Martin

12:07 pm on Thursday, March 3, 2011

There has been some confusion about the Municipal Government Committee hearing today on House Bill 5186. This is a bill which would remove the requirement for school bus monitors in grades kindergarten through five).

The confusion was caused by the temporary posting of a message that the bill had been withdrawn by its primary sponsor - Rep. Doreen M. Costa (Republican- District 31, Exeter, North Kingstown).

Just after we sent that information out, one of the cosponsors, Brian C. Newberry (Republican-District 48, North Smithfield, Burrillville) stepped up to be the primary sponsor of the bill. At that point, the bill was reposted on the committee calendar.

Rep. Daniel P. Gordon Jr. (Republican- District 71, Portsmouth, Tiverton, Little Compton) [401)]252-9882] is still on the bill as a cosponsor.

So it was 'on again, off again, on again'! Here is a link to the website showing the commitee calendar: http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/gen_assembly/Daily/ComMeetings/hgovmet.htm

The hearing will be held 'at the rise', which means at the end of the House session. That is usually around 5 pm this time of the year.

It is currently scheduled for room 203 [take the elevator the second floor, turn right, go to the end of the hall]. Due to the overwhelming interest in this matter, I have just asked for a larger room.

Rep. Peter Martin
District 75
Newport

Reply

Angela Lemire

1:21 pm on Thursday, March 3, 2011

According to the House docket, the hearing has been moved to a larger room, Room 35.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Julie Mott

11:26 pm on Friday, March 4, 2011

It's a good thing that they moved the hearing to a larger room. Lots of proponents FOR keeping bus monitors attended despite the confusion. I do not know when hearing 2 will take place yet but I will be sure to post it here so that interested parties have a chance to be heard!

Leave a comment