Boy Scouts To Reconsider Ban on Gay Members
The Boy Scouts of America could reverse its decades-old ban on allowing homosexual members and leaders as early as next week, leaving the decision to local troops.
Just seven months after the Boy Scouts of America reaffirmed its decades-old ban on admitting gay members and leaders, the organization said it could reverse that policy as early as next week.
Scout officials announced on Monday that the organization is considering amending its policy against homosexual participation in favor of allowing local troops to decide on their own, NBC News reports.
If the policy change is approved at next week's national executive board meeting the ban on gay membership would be eliminated from the scout's rules.
"The chartered organizations that oversee and deliver scouting would accept membership and select leaders consistent with their organization’s mission, principles or religious beliefs,” Deron Smith, a spokesman for the Boy Scouts’ national organization told NBC News on Monday.
Tiverton scout leader and Town Councilor William P. Gerlach said the news was positive, but was discouraged that the Boy Scouts chose to sidestep such a divisive and important social issue.
"I think this is a step in the right direction and it's a positive development, but I think the national organization can do more," said Gerlach. "They have basically absolved themselves of the responsibility and pushed the decision on whether or not to admit gay and lesbian scouts and leaders onto the local organizations that sponsor the local units."
As far as Tiverton's scout organizations go, homosexuality is - and has been - a non-issue. Gerlach said his cub scouts troop has never had an issue with homosexuality, but added that he discussed the national Boy Scouts' organization ban with other local scout leaders and all agreed that sexuality was irrelevant to participation.
"Our local unit remains committed to an inclusive program on all levels," said Gerlach.
While the New York times reported that scout officials offered no timeline on making the formal decision, most other media outlets are anticipating a decision after discussion on the issue at next week's national executive board meeting.
Activists on both sides of the issue spoke out on Monday on the unintended consequences of leaving the decision on whether or not to allow gays up to individual scouting troops. The New York Times reported that supporters of the ban feared the Boy Scouts' softened approach could undermine the organization's legacy of producing great, moral leaders. Equality activists worried the piecemeal approach would encourage discrimination in some troops.
The battle to end the ban on gay members and leaders in the Boy Scouts began decades ago, but recently regained momentum as a result of public and private backlash when the scouts reaffirmed their policy position in 2012. That same policy endured a Supreme Court trial in 2000.
What's your opinion on allowing gay members and leaders in the Boy Scouts? Do you think Boy Scouts' headquarters should issue a more definitive policy change allowing homosexuals? What will be the repercussions of allowing individual units to ban or allow gay members? Tell us in the comments below.
John
8:44 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
I wouldn't want my son to be camping out with a gay boy in the same tent! Why dont they start there own scout troop? They can call it Gay Scouts.
nagaer40
11:37 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
A person who is sexually attracted to members of the same sex should not be allowed to mentor and influence young boys.
IMHO
3:14 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
But it's ok for women to mentor and influence young boys? I am fully aware that some do feel strongly that women should NOT be involved with Boys Scouts, but they are. Should we be more concerned about them not being able to control themselves? What about lesbians? Are they as potentially harmful to young males as gay men?
You do realize that most men who molest young boys consider themselves straight and are usually married to a women, don't you? They even have kids of their own. Prime example: Jerry Sandusky
I am not saying that I don't have similar concerns, I'm just not sure my concerns are have any validity. It's easy to trust the all American dad and husband, that's why they make good predators.
Robert Cronin
2:44 pm on Monday, March 11, 2013
One has to be KRAZY to allow a homosexual male to supervise innocent boys who are in the biological process of becoming sexually mature --- ABSOLUTELY KRAZY !!! ----- such a scenario reminds one of putting "a fox in charge of the chicken coop" ----- get real folks ----- why do you think homosexual adult males would love to have the opportunity to befriend and mentor innocent prepubescent / adolescent males ---- I know ---- to teach them how to tie knots or to teach them how to stay warm all over at night ??? /// :O(
Peter A. Filippi III
10:10 am on Wednesday, April 17, 2013
For decades, I supported such groups as Focus on the Family, American Family Association, Family Research Council, Concerned Women for American and American Center for Law and Justice. The bottom line is according to every medical study and survey the homosexual lifestyle is not only bazaar but unequivocally self destructive. Just recently on Fox News, America's number one news organization and growing everyday made note that children brought up in same sex households will likely have emotional problems.