Twelve Potential Wind Turbine Spots Proposed by Naval Station Newport
Following an Evaluation Assessment, the end result could be different areas with potentially different size wind turbines.
The Naval Station Newport on Thursday night held an Open House at Middletown High School for Aquidneck Island residents to learn about the proposed development of wind turbines.
Several tables were set-up with experts at each for attendees to walk through, and they were encouraged to write down questions and feedback to drop into boxes. Captain Joseph Voboril, Commanding Officer of Naval Station Newport, greeted guests, listened to concerned residents, and explained the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the development of wind energy facilities at Naval Station Newport.
The Open House began at 4 p.m. and within an hour, about 80 attendees had already been through. A packet of information was given to all, explaining the goals of the project to ensure long-term sustainability of Naval Station Newport.
Naval Station Newport is one of the largest consumers of electricity in the state of Rhode Island, spending an average of $12 million annually. The base load electrical consumption is approximately nine megawatts and the proposed wind turbine project will potentially produce up to these nine megawatts, representing 26-percent of current annual electrical consumption. This would result in at least a $3 million savings, the materials explained.
As previously noted, Naval Station Newport aims to become more self-sufficient and maximize the Navy’s ability to meet or exceed renewable power supply goals mandated in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Executive Order 13423.
The wind turbines would be constructed at some combination of twelve sites on Naval Station Newport, ranging from Portsmouth down to Newport. Joanne Galuska, Deputy Public Works Officer of Naval Station Newport, said the end result could be a couple of different areas with potentially different size wind turbines.
“We’ve done extensive research regarding these 12 proposed sites,” Galuska said. “The space around the turbines needs to be 1.5 times its height, and the Federal Aviation Administration limits the height as well.”
The EA, which has been initiated by Captain Voboril, is in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It is expected to be completed in September 2011 and the EA will be one of the determining factors. In addition to compliance with the FAA, other criteria for placement and sizes include:
- Efficient and cost effective construction and maintenance.
- No significant adverse impact on natural resources, cultural resources, protected species, human environment or socioeconomics of the region.
- Geotechnical requirements for structural considerations.
Residents that attended the event had several concerns, mostly because they didn’t want to see the turbines from their homes. To address those concerns and others, many studies are in the works for a Bird and Bat Biological Survey, a Noise and Shadow Flicker Study, and a Marine Mammal Observation Study.
Captain Voboril said that this has been in the works for about three years.
“It’s taken this long to come to this point. In fact my predecessor was the first to begin the research. But we’re excited to be here,” he said.
It would be another couple of years before the turbines were actually constructed. Naval Station Newport would still need to seek funding for the project, and then it would need to be designed and then, finally, construction.
Bill Carson
10:37 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
The Portsmouth High School wind turbine problems should serve as a good example of what kind of wind turbine not to purchase . How many and how long has the Portsmouth high School wind turbine broken down ? We'll probably never know .The advocates for wind turbines put out how many hours in a row this turbine works of how many kilowatts it generates but the outages seem never to get reported . This turbine has had dead batteries ? It won't sart in the cold ,no warranty because the company went out of businesss ,waiting for parts from Germany and when people who drive on the highway ask why isn't the turbine spinning like the one at Portsmouth Abbey they are told it's a different type of turbine than the Abbey . No matter what kind of turbine it is if it isn't spinning -- it's not working
William F Horan
8:25 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
It is time for the USN to abandon this overreach & encroachment on Aquidneck Island Communities once again. . Yes, an ill advised and dangerous USN Newport 12 each Wind Turbine generator scheme on the West Side of Aquidneck Island. This makes no economic sense and is a mirror image of the failed national energy policy and a looting of the Treasury. Finally, this scheme is an assault on the already encumbered RI Public Utilities installation base. Yes, WTG are not compatible with the operating profile for the areas in place generating facilities and WTG will significantly stress and shorten the conventional installations life. WTG are based on Voodoo economics and economic terrorism of the tax payer. What we have in RI is very high utility rates because the rates are artificially elevated to service the welfare wealth redistribution industry and second support the bunko renewable green energy political cult of true believers. The proposed WTG sites are land that long ago should have been returned to the towns for both private and public use.